In many Indian villages, people can predict the future of a farming season just by looking at a well.

If water levels hold after winter, there is optimism. If the water drops too quickly, anxiety spreads across farms and homes long before anyone says it aloud.

The uncertainty is familiar now.

Some years bring delayed rain. Some bring sudden heavy downpours that disappear within days. In one season, fields crack under heat. In another, water floods the same land briefly before draining away.

And somewhere in between these extremes stands the Indian farmer waiting, adjusting, and hoping that the next crop survives.

India’s rural water crisis is often described as a shortage problem. But in many ways, it is also a storage problem, a planning problem, and sometimes even a landscape problem. India received plenty of rainfall, with an average annual rainfall of 1160 mm/year, but still faces severe water problems in many parts. Floods and drought come every year, sometimes both together also. Certainly, India’s major problem is mismanagement of water resources.

Rain falls. Yet villages remain thirsty.

This is exactly why conversations around watershed management have become increasingly important in recent years. Not because it is a fashionable development term, but because it deals with something fundamental: helping rainwater stay where it falls. Rain replenishes all sources of water—bore wells, open wells, rivers, canals, lakes, tanks, and ponds among others.

India’s Agriculture Water Problem Is No Longer Seasonal

Water stress in villages used to be spoken about mainly during drought years.

But that has changed.

Now, even regions with decent rainfall frequently experience:

For farmers, this has slowly altered the economics of agriculture itself.

Tube wells go deeper every few years. Diesel costs rise. Electricity demand increases. Crops become riskier. Indian agriculture remains heavily dependent on water.

Large parts of smallholder farming still rely directly or indirectly on groundwater extraction. In 2024, India’s total annual groundwater extraction was 245.64 billion cubic meters (BCM), which is more than the combined usage of the US and China.

India is the world’s largest user of groundwater, extracting nearly 25% of the global supply. 

The pressure is visible across states where:

And yet, every monsoon, enormous quantities of rainwater still flow away unused. Rainwater must be conserved wherever possible; it can be stored in tanks for direct usage or recharged into groundwater for later use.

That contradiction sits at the center of India’s water story.

The focus in India has been on huge infrastructure and large-scale irrigation projects, but so far only 1/3 of land is under irrigation and 2/3 is still rainfed.

What Is Watershed Management, really?

The phrase sounds technical at first, but the basic idea is surprisingly practical.

A watershed is simply an area where rainwater drains toward a common point—a pond, stream, river, or lake.

Instead of looking at wells, ponds, and fields separately, the watershed approach looks at the entire landscape together.

The logic is simple: if rainwater is slowed down and allowed to soak into the ground gradually, more water stays present and available for longer periods.

That process involves managing:

all together instead of individually.

When people talk about watershed management in India, they are essentially talking about improving the way landscapes capture, store, and use rainwater naturally.

Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM)

The components are often managed through an Integrated Water Resource Management (IWRM) approach, which considers the water cycle as a single connected system. IWRM promotes coordinated development and management of water, land, and related resources to maximize economic and social benefits while minimizing environmental impacts. By understanding and effectively managing these components, communities can ensure sustainable water use and protect vital water resources for future generations.

What Happens in a Watershed Project?

A typical watershed management project include several small interventions rather than one massive structure, such as:

Individually, some of these structures look modest. But when spread out over a watershed area together, they begin changing how water behaves across an entire area.

Instead of rushing away after rainfall, water slows down. Soil erosion reduces. Moisture remains longer. Groundwater recharge improves gradually.

The results are not dramatic overnight transformations. They are slower, quieter changes, – but often more lasting.

The results are not dramatic overnight transformations. They are slower, quieter changes, – but often more lasting.

For decades, rural water problems have mostly been tackled through extraction of groundwater.

In India, 85% of rural water supply is dependent on groundwater. The total annual groundwater recharge is estimated at 446.90 billion cubic meters (BCM), with an annual extraction of 245.64 BCM. This indicates that groundwater plays a crucial role in rural water supply, contributing significantly to agricultural and domestic needs.

These responses helped temporarily, but they rarely strengthened the local water system itself.

In many villages, people now speak about borewells almost the way previous generations spoke about monsoon uncertainty, and with caution.

The fear exists that the next summer may push the water table even lower.

This is why many experts now argue that India cannot keep solving water shortages simply by pulling more water out of the ground.

The focus must shift toward recharge, conservation, and local water management. That is where integrated watershed management is essential.

What Makes Watershed Management Different?

The biggest difference is philosophical. Traditional approaches often try to bring water from somewhere else, fetched from long distances and conveyed through long pipe line and huge capacity pumps and a series of reservoirs. Watershed systems try to hold water locally, enrich local water resources which can be used as per need, more economically and sustainably.

That shift changes everything.

Instead of treating rainwater as something temporary, watershed management treats rainwater as something valuable that must be retained within the landscape as long as possible or diverted into.

This is done by:

Over time, even the smallest improvements begin positively affecting groundwater levels and soil moisture.

And in agriculture, soil moisture matters as much as rainfall itself.

Rajasthan Offers a Familiar Story

In Rajasthan’s Alwar district, villages have lived with water stress for years.

One such village, Samra in Thanaghazi, Alwar., watched rainwater flow through its panchayati land every monsoon. Seasonal streams filled briefly and then emptied into larger river systems downstream.

For villagers, the frustrating part was obvious.

Water passed through the village, but rarely stayed long enough to improve local conditions.

Meanwhile:

Eventually, discussions began around constructing a check dam across the seasonal stream.

What made the effort different was not only the structure itself, but the process around it.

Villagers participated in meetings. A local committee was formed. Community contribution for future maintenance was discussed before construction even began.

When the first strong monsoon arrived after completion, people nearby noticed something unusual. Wells that had remained weak for years began holding more water.

Farmers living close to the structure reported visible improvement in groundwater levels. The change was gradual, but undeniable enough for the village to notice.

No one described it as a miracle.

They described it as relief.

Why Community Participation Matters More Than People Realize

One reason some watershed development projects continue functioning well while others weaken over time comes down to ownership.

A structure alone cannot manage water.

Someone has to:

Without local participation, even technically strong projects often struggle after initial implementation.

This is why successful watershed management programmes usually involve:

People are far more likely to sustain systems they feel connected to. And in rural development, that sense of ownership matters enormously.

When people hear about watershed work, they often think only about groundwater recharge. But the impact usually spreads much further.

Soil Begins Holding Moisture Better

Reduced runoff helps the soil retain water for longer durations.

For farmers, this can mean:

Land Degradation Slows Down

Fast-moving runoff carries away fertile topsoil. Watershed structures reduce erosion and help stabilize agricultural land over time.

Farming Becomes Slightly Less Risky

No watershed system can eliminate climate uncertainty completely. But improved soil moisture, improved availability of surface and underground water help farmers cope better during difficult seasons.

That stability matters. Even a few extra weeks of water availability can change crop outcomes significantly.

Climate Change Makes This More Urgent

The relationship between climate-resilient agriculture and water management is becoming impossible to ignore.

Rainfall patterns are becoming harder to predict:

These efforts rarely create dramatic headlines. Yet they often create long lasting change and impact.

The Real Lesson Is Surprisingly Simple

India does not necessarily need to chase water deeper underground every year. In many places, it needs to become better at holding the rain it already receives. That is the quiet strength of watershed management for sustainable agriculture.

This process does not promise instant transformation.

This process does not promise instant transformation.

And maybe that is exactly why it matters. Because in rural India, survival has rarely depended on sudden abundance.

More often, it has depended on whether resources last long enough to carry people through the next season.

The phrase “watershed moment” is used to describe a turning point, a decisive event that changes the course of history or people’s lives. In the same way, watershed works (like check dams, percolation tanks, recharge wells, ponds, and gully plugs) create literal turning points in rural communities by transforming water scarcity into water security.

Community empowerment holds the key of long-term sustainability.

Creating awareness on water conservation practices among local communities is important and must include all sections of the society including women, youth, farmers, school children, etc. Most importantly, local people must be involved in the project interventions from the beginning with a sense of ownership that will ensure sustainability of any interventions done in villages. Proper training and empowerment on proper management and operation and maintenance issues holds the key to long-term sustainability of water management interventions.

About the Reviewer

Mr. Salahuddin Saiphy
Principal Lead, Water Management, S M Sehgal Foundation

Master’s in Applied Geology and PG Diploma in Hydrogeology (Aligarh Muslim University); diploma in Environmental Monitoring and Impact Assessment (Jamia Hamdard University, New Delhi). Water management expert with 25+ years of experience in designing, implementing, and monitoring sustainable water solutions, including rainwater harvesting, groundwater recharge, and irrigation systems across rural and urban areas.

The post Watershed Management: A Long-Term Solution to India’s Agriculture Water Crisis appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

Around late October every year, the sky in northern parts of India begins to change color.

Blue sky slowly disappears behind a pale gray sheet. People often avoid going out for walks in the morning. Parents check pollution levels before sending children outdoors. News channels start running familiar visuals—highways swallowed by smog, people wearing masks, aircraft struggling to land.

Blue sky slowly disappears behind a pale gray sheet. People often avoid going out for walks in the morning. Parents check pollution levels before sending children outdoors. News channels start running familiar visuals—highways swallowed by smog, people wearing masks, aircraft struggling to land.

But standing beside a burning field, and watching smoke rise into the sky, tells only half the story.

Because for the farmer, that fire is not an act of forced choice against the environment. It is usually a decision made under pressure—hurried, imperfect, and shaped by realities most urban conversations rarely account for.

That is what makes the issue of stubble burning in India so difficult. The issue resides at an intersection between agriculture, economics, environment, and society.

Unless all those layers are understood together, the smoke will continue to return every winter.

What Exactly Is Stubble Burning?

After paddy is harvested, large portions of stalk and straw remain on the field. This leftover plant material is called stubble, or crop residue.

Farmers must clear it before sowing the next crop—usually wheat.

The problem is timing.

The gap between paddy harvesting and wheat sowing is short. Sometimes farmers have less than four weeks to prepare the land again. Delayed sowing directly affects wheat productivity, which eventually affects household income.

Removing residue manually is not economically viable. Machinery is not always accessible. Burning is the quickest and cheapest option available.

Within hours, an entire field can be cleared.

Simple. Fast. Cheap.

And deeply damaging.

The Problem Looks Different from the Farm

In cities, stubble-burning pollution is often discussed in air quality numbers and on pollution maps.

The practice is not just environmental negligence; it is tied to how agriculture currently functions in large parts of India.

Why Farmers Continue Burning Fields

There is a tendency to assume that farmers continue the practice because they are unaware of the consequences.

But most already know.

Many have heard repeated warnings about pollution, soil damage, and health risks. Some have even attended awareness sessions or demonstrations around residue management.

Yet burning continues, because alternatives are often difficult to sustain economically.

The Harvest-sowing Window Is Small.

Paddy harvesting ends late in the season. Wheat sowing must begin quickly.

If sowing is delayed:

For a farmer already operating with thin margins, such a delay can be financially risky.

Burning clears fields within a day. Other methods need money, time, and machines.

Labor Is No Longer Affordable For Many.

A generation ago, crop residue could be removed manually with larger labor availability in villages.

But that equation has changed.

Rural labor is increasingly scarce during peak agricultural seasons. Wage rates have risen steadily. Hiring workers to clear residue field by field is expensive for small farmers.

And most farms in India are small.

Machinery Exists , But Limited Accessibility, Availability And Affordability Doesn’t Always Exist.

Machines such as:

have changed residue management possibilities.

But on the ground, availability remains uneven.

A farmer may know about these technologies and still not be able to access them when needed most. Renting machinery during peak season can involve long waiting periods. Purchasing it individually is unrealistic for many smaller landholders.

The Smoke Does Not Stay in the Village

One reason stubble burning in Punjab and Haryana receives national attention is because its effects travel through capital territory. Smoke does not stop at district borders.

During winter, weather conditions trap pollutants closer to the surface. Winds carry smoke toward urban regions that are already struggling with pollution from vehicles, construction, and industrial activity.

According to multiple studies and air quality assessments, farm fires contribute significantly to seasonal spikes in PM2.5 levels across North India.

The issue becomes larger than agriculture; becoming a public health problem.

Breathing Becomes Harder.

Health effects are visible almost immediately during severe pollution episodes.

Hospitals report increases in:

Children and older adults are usually affected first.

But the damage is not limited to short-term discomfort. Repeated exposure to polluted air has long-term consequences on lung health and overall well-being.

That is why conversations around air pollution in India cannot ignore agricultural pollution altogether.

What Burning Does to the Soil:

The damage caused by crop residue burning is not only visible in the air. It also happens quietly beneath the surface.

When residue is burned:

Over time, this affects soil structure and fertility.

Many farmers already speak about declining soil quality and increasing dependence on fertilizers. Burning contributes to that gradual exhaustion.

This creates a difficult cycle:

A short-term solution has slowly created a long-term problem.

Climate Change Makes the Crisis Worse.

The fires also release greenhouse gases such as:

These emissions contribute to the larger relationship between climate change and agriculture.

At the same time, Indian farmers are already dealing with:

Agriculture is both contributing to environmental pressure and also suffering because of it. That contradiction sits at the heart of the crisis.

The Real Problem Is Structural

Reducing the issue to “farmers burning fields” oversimplifies a much-deeper agricultural imbalance.

The persistence of crop residue burning reflects:

The smoke seen every winter is really the visible symptom of a system under strain.

Solutions Exist, But They Need Support.

The good news is that alternatives are no longer theoretical.

Across different regions, farmers are already experimenting with residue management techniques that avoid burning.

The challenge is scaling them meaningfully.

In Situ Crop Residue Management

This approach that manages residue directly within the field instead of removing or burning it involves:

Machines such as the Super Seeder help sow wheat directly into soil after mixing residue.

Farmers using these systems have reported benefits such as:

But adoption still depends heavily on affordability and local availability.

Crop Residue Can Become a Resource.

An important shift is happening around how residue itself is viewed.

Instead of treating stubble as waste, several industries now see it as useful biomass.

Crop residue can be used for:

This creates opportunities for biomass management and additional rural income streams.

But these systems require proper supply chains: transportation, storage, buyers, and processing infrastructure.

Without that ecosystem, farmers still fall back on burning.

Community Models Are Quietly Working

In several regions, shared machinery systems and village-level cooperation have produced encouraging results.

Instead of individual ownership, farmers collectively access residue management equipment through:

This reduces costs and improves access during critical sowing periods.

Interestingly, behavioral change often begins not with policy, but with visibility.

When one farmer successfully manages residue without burning, and others see the results, conversations begin to change.

That kind of local trust matters more than official instructions alone.

The Conversation Needs to Change Too.

Every year, discussions around stubble burning become emotionally charged.

Cities demand cleaner air. Farmers defend their constraints. Governments announce seasonal crackdowns.

But lasting change rarely comes from confrontation alone.

The issue needs a more-balanced conversation—one that recognizes:

Because farmers cannot carry the burden of transition alone.

This Is Not Just About Smoke.

What burns every winter is not only crop residue.

It includes:

The smoke hanging over cities is really a signal pointing toward deeper agricultural stress.

Yet, there is room for optimism.

SOLUTIONS EXIST. TECHNOLOGIES EXIST. 

Farmers are willing to adapt when alternatives become practical and affordable.

The path forward requires:

MOST IMPORTANTLY, it will require empathy.

Because no environmental solution succeeds for long if it ignores the realities of the people expected to implement it.

Perhaps that is where the conversation around stubble burning solutions must finally begin.

About the Reviewer

Pawan Kumar
Principal Lead for Agriculture Development

Pawan Kumar is the Principal Lead for Agriculture Development at Sehgal Foundation, with over 27 years of experience in scaling NGO and CSR initiatives. An Oxford-educated development professional, recognized as one of the top agri-food pioneers by the World Food Prize Foundation in 2024, Pawan has a strong track record in organizational growth, fund mobilization, and sustainable development.

The post Stubble to Sustainability: Crop Residue Management appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has evolved significantly over the past decade. From being a peripheral activity, CSR has moved closer to boardroom conversations, ESG frameworks, and long-term business strategy.

But a persistent question remains: Why do some initiatives create lasting change, while others fade once funding cycles end?

Across sectors in education, water, and agriculture, projects often begin with strong intent. Infrastructure is built. Programs are launched. Reports are filed. But when external support withdraws, many of these efforts struggle to sustain themselves.

The difference lies not in the scale of investment, but in engagement.

Meaningful, long-term impact is rarely the result of funding alone. Lasting impact is built through partnerships that combine resources with understanding, scale with context, and strategy with grassroots insight.

This is where corporate-NGO partnerships begin to matter—not as a model of delivery, but as a model of collaboration.

Why CSR Alone Often Falls Short?

Traditional CSR approaches have achieved important milestones. However, they often face structural limitations.

Many initiatives are:

For example, building infrastructures—whether classrooms, water systems, or community assets—addresses immediate needs. But without ownership, maintenance, and behavioral change, these assets tend to underperform over time.

This creates a gap between what is delivered and what is sustained.

CSR, when implemented in isolation, risks becoming transactional, solving for visibility, but not always for continuity.

The Strength of Corporate-NGO Partnerships

Corporate-NGO partnerships address this gap by combining complementary strengths.

What Corporates Bring:

What NGOs Bring:

When these strengths align, the result is not just execution—it is context-sensitive scaling.

A corporate can design for scale, but an NGO ensures that scale does not dilute relevance. Similarly, an NGO can build deep engagement, and corporate support enables expansion beyond pilot geographies.

Together, they create a balance between reach and depth.

From Funding to Partnership: A Fundamental Shift

The transition from traditional CSR to partnership-based models represents a shift in mindset.

In a partnership model, roles are not rigid. They evolve through dialogue and shared objectives.

Corporates are no longer just funders. NGOs are no longer just implementers. Both become cocreators of impact.

This shift promotes:

increased likelihood that interventions will remain relevant over time.

The Model That Works: Community-Centered Development

At the heart of successful partnerships lies one consistent principle—community ownership.

Development efforts that engage communities actively tend to sustain themselves. Those that bypass local participation often struggle after initial implementation.

Community-centered development focuses on:

This approach is particularly effective across sectors such as:

In each case, the role of the NGO is not to deliver the solutions, but to facilitate them. The corporate enables scale, but the community ensures sustainability.

A Case from the Ground: When Partnership Translates into Impact

In Alwar district of Rajasthan, a district-level conference brought together school management committee (SMC) members, gram panchayat representatives, school leaders, and education officials.

The objective was simple: strengthen community participation in school development.

A total of 147 stakeholders participated, including:

What emerged from the discussions was not just a review of progress, but a shared understanding.

School transformation cannot be sustained without community ownership.

Participants shared practical experiences—improving school environments, strengthening monitoring systems, and supporting holistic child development. More importantly, many reaffirmed their commitment to maintaining these improvements.

This example highlights a key insight.

When corporates support structured interventions, and NGOs facilitate community engagement, the result is not just improved infrastructure or processes. It is behavioral change—a shift in how communities perceive and participate in development.

Measuring What Matters: Moving Beyond Outputs

One of the defining features of effective partnerships is how impact is measured.

Traditional models often focus on outputs:

While these are important, they do not capture long-term change.

Outcome-driven approaches focus on:

For example:

This shift from outputs to outcomes allows partnerships to align more closely with sustainable development goals.

Why This Model Is Scalable?

Scalability is often misunderstood as replication. In reality, scalability depends on adaptability.

Corporate–NGO partnerships enable scalable impact because:

Importantly, scalability is not just about expanding reach. Scalability helps to maintain effectiveness across different contexts.

The Business Case for Corporates

For corporates, engaging in meaningful partnerships is not only a social responsibility—scalability is a strategic opportunity.

Key benefits include:

This shifts CSR from a compliance activity to a value-driven investment.

The Way Forward: Building Effective Partnerships

Creating meaningful partnerships requires more than alignment of objectives. This requires alignment of approach.

Key considerations include:

Partnerships must remain flexible. Development challenges are dynamic, and solutions must evolve accordingly.

Impact That Endures

Sustainable impact is rarely the result of isolated efforts.

Impact emerges when:

Corporate-NGO partnerships represent this convergence.

They demonstrate that meaningful change is not built through transactions, but through collaboration; not through one-time interventions, but through sustained engagement.

In a landscape where development challenges are complex and interconnected, partnerships offer a way forward that is both practical and scalable.

Because, in the end, impact that lasts is never created alone. Impact is built together.

About the Reviewer

Arti Manchanda Grover
Senior Manager, Public Relations at the S M Sehgal Foundation

Arti Manchanda Grover, Senior Manager, Public Relations at the S M Sehgal Foundation, where she leads communication strategies, media outreach, and storytelling initiatives that support impactful rural development programs. With experience of more than 18 years in the nonprofit sector, she brings strong expertise in corporate social responsibility, community media, and development communication.

The post How Do Corporate-NGO Partnerships Deliver Meaningful Sustainable Impact? appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

Across India, transformation often begins with collaboration—when purpose-driven corporates join hands with trusted development partners. Over the years, S M Sehgal Foundation (SMSF) has become a preferred ally for companies seeking to make a measurable difference through their CSR initiatives.

Through shared goals, transparent execution, and a deep understanding of community needs, these partnerships have reached thousands of villages—improving access to water, livelihoods, education, and opportunity. These collaborations continue to envision a positive, brighter future for rural communities.

Reviving Water Security, Village by Village

SMSF’s associations have been instrumental in addressing one of rural India’s most pressing challenges—water scarcity. Through CSR collaborations on water conservation, projects focusing on sustainable water management, including groundwater recharge, increased water availability and access to clean drinking water, the initiative has enhanced water security across several states.

The projects go beyond physical structures. They involve communities in designing and maintaining their own water infrastructure, ensuring long-term ownership and sustainability. These interventions have revitalized agriculture, reduced migration, and restored hope in water-stressed regions—a model for how corporate partners can build resilience through thoughtful action.

The foundation team has implemented large-scale water conservation and watershed development projects that combine technical innovation with local participation.

SMSF’s focus on integrated water resource management aligns closely with partnerships for the (CSR) goals, demonstrating how CSR in India can bridge environmental and community priorities at once.

Agriculture Development for Small Farmers

For more than a decade, SMSF’s Agriculture Development program has shown how corporate partnerships can transform smallholder agriculture. The program focuses on improving soil health, promoting efficient irrigation and farm mechanization, and enhancing crop diversity, working closely with Farmer Producer Organizations (FPOs) on better inputs, business and value addition, and market access.

With climate action becoming central, the focus has been on building climate-smart, sustainable farming models that improve yields while conserving natural resources. Farmers receive training on pest management, water-efficient irrigation, and soil care.

Thousands of farmers have reported better soil health, increased productivity and income, supported by hands-on training and resource optimization. This sustainable development partnership stands out for its long-term approach, empowering rural families while protecting natural resources for future generations.

Empowering Women Farmers for Growth

Women’s empowerment as a cross-cutting imperative is pivotal in enhancing women-led rural development. The partnerships have supported women farmers by helping them organise into collective micro-enterprises, access markets, and adopt improved farming techniques and manage custom hiring centers.

The result is not just better livelihoods but enhanced confidence and decision-making power among rural women. It reflects the true essence of sustainable development partnerships—creating impact that uplifts households as well as communities.

Transforming Schools and Water Access

The Transform Lives one school at a time program focuses on improving education infrastructure and WASH in rural schools. The project initiatives have established smart classrooms, toilets, safe drinking water facilities, and hygiene awareness in government schools, creating improved facilities for schoolchildren.

The outcomes are visible: higher attendance, especially among girls, and more vibrant, inclusive learning spaces, uplifting the government mandate of education for all.

Advancing Climate-Smart Farming

With climate action becoming central, the focus has been on building climate-smart, sustainable farming models that improve yields while conserving natural resources. Farmers receive training on pest management, water-efficient irrigation, and soil care.

These interventions have helped small farmers reduce input costs, protect soil fertility, and improve incomes—all while contributing to India’s food and climate security goals. This is a strong example of how corporate partners can turn agricultural sustainability into a shared success story.

Partnerships for the Goals

What connects all these initiatives is a shared belief that CSR in India is most effective when it strengthens local systems and fosters ownership within communities. Each collaboration has contributed to clean water, better education, empowered women, and more sustainable agriculture.

This also demonstrates how partnerships for the goals translate into measurable progress on the ground. They reaffirm that true impact comes from consistent collaboration, transparency, and trust.

Over to You

Every successful partnership begins with a shared purpose. When businesses and development organizations work together with intent, change multiplies—from a single well that transforms a village to a vibrant school that shapes futures.

For corporates looking to align their CSR with national priorities and the Sustainable Development Goals, this collaborative model offers a path that blends purpose with performance and builds a legacy of meaningful, lasting impact across rural India.

Priya Chaudhary
Social Impact, CSR, and Gender & Development

Priya Chaudhary is an expert in Social Impact, CSR, and Gender & Development with a focus on gender equity, social inclusion, and evidence-based change. With extensive experience in project management, storytelling, and qualitative research, she has worked on various NGO marketing and development projects.

The post Driving Sustainable Change Across Rural India appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

When Water Flows Freely—and When It Doesn’t

In one part of India, water flows as if unlimited.

A tap is opened. A bucket fills. A shower runs longer than necessary. Water is present, assumed, and often taken for granted.

In another part of the same country, the day begins differently.

A woman walks several kilometers before sunrise, carrying metal containers. The path is uneven. The wait is uncertain. The return journey is heavier—not just with water, but with the weight of routine.

This contrast defines the water crisis in India.

This crisis is about more than water shortage. This is about unequal access. Water stress in India is lived differently depending on geography, infrastructure, and governance.

In a country fed by major rivers, this contradiction raises a simple, unsettling question:

In a country of rivers, why do millions still thirst?

A Story from the Ground: Where Water Slips Away

In many villages across semiarid regions, water is not entirely absent, but it is fleeting.

In a typical village landscape during the monsoon. Rain arrives in bursts. Seasonal streams swell, rush through fields, and disappear just as quickly. For a moment, water is everywhere. Within weeks, scarcity returns.

For families, this cycle shapes everyday life.

This burden is unevenly distributed. Women carry the physical load. Farmers bear the economic risk. Entire communities adjust their lives around water availability.

Rather than an isolated experience, this reflects a wider pattern of water insecurity across all of rural India.

From One Village to a National Crisis

The story of one village mirrors a larger national reality.

India is among the most water-stressed countries in the world. Rapid population growth, changing climate patterns, and unsustainable usage have intensified pressure on water resources.

Several factors contribute to the growing water scarcity in India:

India water crisis statistics indicate that a significant portion of the population faces high to extreme water stress.

But scarcity alone does not explain the crisis.

Why the Problem Persists?

The persistence of the water crisis lies less in availability and more in management.

These water conservation challenges highlight a deeper issue: water scarcity is not just natural—the problem is systemic.

The Turning Point: When Communities Begin to Act

A shift begins when water is no longer seen as an external problem, but as a shared responsibility.

In several intervention areas, community-led efforts have demonstrated a different approach. Instead of focusing only on supply, the focus shifted to managing water where it falls.

In such cases, external organizations act as facilitators, not as providers, helping communities understand their own water systems.

The approach includes:

This model moves communities from dependency to participation.

Community-Led Water Management: A Practical Approach

Sustainable water solutions are most effective when they are locally owned.

Community-led water management focuses:

Though not new ideas, when implemented consistently, this approach creates sustainable water solutions that last beyond project timelines.

Proof of Impact: When Water Stays

Over time, these changes contribute to:

Water, once fleeting, begins to stay.

The Opportunity: Scale Impact Through Collaboration

The scale of the water crisis in India requires solutions that go beyond isolated interventions.

Significant opportunity for collaboration exists, particularly with corporate and institutional partners.

Effective engagement includes:

Such partnerships can expand community-led solutions across water-stressed regions.

The advantage of this approach lies in its scalability. Once communities are trained, and systems are established, the model becomes self-sustaining.

Returning to the Contrast

The contrast remains.

In cities, water flows—often unnoticed.

In villages, water defines daily life.

But this contrast is not inevitable.

The story of water in India does not have to remain one of imbalance. The solutions already exist. The challenge lies in applying them consistently, locally, and collectively.

Water scarcity is not inevitable—water scarcity is solvable.

When communities and institutions come together, the narrative can shift.

–from scarcity to security,

–from dependence to ownership, and

–from imbalance to shared abundance.

Water managed wisely does more than sustain life—it reshapes futures.

About the Reviewer

Sonia Chopra
Program Leader Communication at S M Sehgal Foundation

Sonia Chopra is Program Leader, Communication at S M Sehgal Foundation, where she drives outreach, advocacy, and digital storytelling to advance rural development. She holds a Master’s degrees in political science, information & library science, and journalism in digital media.

The post Abundance for a Few, Scarcity for Many: India’s Water Scarcity Story and Communities Drive Solutions appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

In many rural homes, a girl’s education is seen as important, but not urgent; necessary, but negotiable. Education competes with household responsibilities, financial uncertainty, distance, and sometimes with grief.

Yet when the right learning space exists—safe, encouraging, digitally enabled, and guided—something remarkable happens. Education stops being a routine and becomes a turning point.

Across rural India, quality learning spaces are “unchaining” possibility for girls who might otherwise have been limited by circumstance. These spaces are not defined by walls alone. They are defined by access, mentorship, exposure, and belief.

And sometimes, all it takes is one such space to change a life.

Why Learning Spaces Matter

The Physical Barrier: When Access Is the First Obstacle

In many villages, the nearest school may be reachable, but access to quality learning is not always guaranteed. Digital resources are scarce. Libraries are limited. Exposure to career pathways beyond the immediate surroundings is minimal.

For girls especially, mobility can be restricted. Time is divided between studies and household work. Opportunities for structured digital learning are rare.

When digital libraries and structured programs like Digital and Life Skills Awareness (DLSA) are introduced, they do more than add computers to a room. They create access to information, skills, and possibilities.

Sahila, from Mahua Khurd village, first encountered such a space during her school years. Through the DLSA initiative, she was introduced to computer literacy and structured thinking about life skills. For a rural student, that exposure was not common, and it made a big difference.

The Educational Barrier: When Guidance Is Missing

Many girls are first-generation learners. They attend school, complete assignments, and prepare for exams—but often without guidance on what comes next. Career planning is rarely structured. Backup plans are seldom discussed. The idea of mapping out one’s future can feel distant.

However, during a DLSA session on “Goals and Plans,” Sahila began shaping her aspiration. She wanted to become a teacher, to serve. The idea was no longer vague; it became her Plan A. She applied for a Bachelor of Arts program and was selected in the first list.

But life does not always follow a straight plan.

After completing her first semester, Sahila faced health challenges. The disruption meant she could not submit applications for the next semester. Results did not come. The academic path she had carefully begun seemed to be slipping away.

What could have been the end of her education became a pause because she stayed connected to her DLSA instructor. This valuable continued mentorship redirected her. The instructor informed her about applications for a government-sponsored nursing program. Sahila applied and was accepted.

The lesson was subtle but powerful: quality learning spaces do not disappear after class ends. They remain as networks of guidance.

The Psychological Barrier: When Confidence Is Shaken

Sometimes the greatest obstacle is not distance or access but grief, fear, and/or self-doubt.

Divya Verma from Indergarh village experienced this brutally. In February 2025, she lost her father suddenly. She was in Class 12, with board exams approaching. The emotional shock was compounded by financial strain.

For many girls in similar situations, education would have quietly ended.

But Divya was attending the Digital and Life Skills Awareness program at the digital library in her school. The principal and Rekha Madam from the S M Sehgal Foundation did not offer dramatic solutions—but they offered steady encouragement. They reminded her that focusing on her studies would be the strongest support for her future.

She returned to the library daily. She studied. She made notes. On days when motivation faltered, someone was there to remind her why she should continue. She scored 81 percent in her board exams. She became eligible for the Gargi Award. The achievement was academic, but the transformation was emotional. Her confidence had returned.

Quality learning spaces do not eliminate hardship. They make resilience possible.

Beyond the Classroom: When One Girl Moves Forward

Education does not end with an exam result.

Sahila is now enrolled in a government-sponsored nursing program. Her earlier digital training gave her a distinct advantage. Her computer proficiency helped her excel in subjects where others struggled. She completed the RS-CIT (Rajasthan State Certificate in Information Technology) course and secured the top position, which was a quiet but meaningful affirmation of her ability.

More importantly, Sahila has begun assisting other children in learning computer skills through the same DLSA classes that once shaped her. During a school inspection, government officials were surprised by her confidence and proficiency. When she explained that her skills came from the digital library and life skills sessions, that left an impression.

Divya also stands differently today. The loss she endured did not define her future. Instead, she carries her success as evidence of personal determination and the value of structured support.

When girls are supported to learn well, the ripple effect is evident and visible:

Education becomes less about survival and more about aspiration.

What Makes a “Quality” Learning Space?

Not every classroom automatically becomes transformative. Certain elements make the difference.

Quality learning spaces combine infrastructure with human connection. Technology alone is insufficient. Encouragement alone is incomplete. Their combination opens doors.

Why We Need This Now More Than Ever?

The digital divide in rural India continues to shape educational outcomes. While enrollment at the primary level has improved over years, retention and transition into higher education remain uneven for girls, particularly in rural regions.

Interruptions, whether financial, health-related, or social, disproportionately affect girls’ education. Without safe, supportive spaces that offer academic as well as emotional scaffolding, many drop out quietly.

Improving the quality of learning spaces has a direct impact on retention and enrollment. Access to digital literacy, structured life skills education, and mentorship increases confidence and preparedness. This shifts education from obligation to opportunity.

In a rapidly changing economy, these skills are no longer optional.

The Path Forward: Shared Responsibility

Ensuring that girls have access to quality learning spaces requires collective effort.

Communities must value girls’ education not as a secondary priority but as an investment. Schools must integrate digital literacy and life skills alongside academics. Organizations must continue building infrastructure that bridges access gaps. Donors and partners must recognize that education is not charity—education is nation-building.

If one digital library can steady a grieving student’s confidence, imagine what thousands can do.

If one life skills session can redirect a disrupted career path, imagine the compounded impact.

Sahila’s journey from uncertainty to nursing school . . . Divya’s resilience in the face of loss . . .

These are not isolated stories. They are reminders.

When education is delivered with care, structure, and mentorship, it does more than prepare girls for exams. It prepares them for life.

And when a girl learns without barriers, she does not rise alone. She carries her family, her community, and the next generation forward with her.

That is what it means for education to be truly “unchained.”

About the Reviewer

Sonia Chopra
Program Leader Communication at S M Sehgal Foundation

Sonia Chopra is Program Leader, Communication at S M Sehgal Foundation, where she drives outreach, advocacy, and digital storytelling to advance rural development. She holds a Master’s degrees in political science, information & library science, and journalism in digital media.

The post Education Unchained: How Quality Learning Spaces Open Doors for Girls appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

In discussions about improving government schools, attention often turns to infrastructure gaps, teacher vacancies, or learning outcomes. Yet one of the most important mechanisms for strengthening public education already exists within the system—the School Management Committee (SMC).

Effective school prabandhan (school management) determines whether policies translate into practice. Without structured governance at the school level, issues such as declining enrollment, irregular attendance, limited parental engagement, and weak accountability persist. SMCs were introduced to address precisely these challenges by embedding community participation within school governance.

Across different states, evidence increasingly shows that when communities are informed and actively engaged, school environments improve, and educational outcomes become more sustainable.

What Is School Prabandhan?

School prabandhan refers to the systematic and participatory management of schools. The concept goes beyond administrative control and emphasises shared responsibility between educators, parents, and the broader community.

In practical terms, school prabandhan involves:

Rather than viewing schools as isolated institutions, this framework positions them as community assets. Parents are not passive observers but rather stakeholders in educational progress. When implemented effectively, school prabandhan strengthens trust between families and schools while ensuring greater accountability.

Understanding School Management Committees (SMCs)

School Management Committees were mandated under the Right to Education (RTE) Act, 2009. The Act requires all government and government-aided schools serving children aged six to fourteen years to establish SMCs.

The purpose of SMCs is clear: to institutionalize community participation in school governance.

SMCs act as a bridge between the school administration and the local community. They create a structured platform for parents and local representatives to engage with school functioning, monitor progress, and contribute to planning.

By decentralizing certain aspects of oversight, SMCs make schools more responsive to local needs.

Composition of a School Management Committee

The structure of an SMC is designed to ensure representation, inclusivity, and accountability.

This composition ensures that decision-making reflects the diversity of the school community. The emphasis on women’s representation is particularly significant, as it strengthens mothers’ participation in educational governance.

Roles and Responsibilities of SMCs

When functioning effectively, SMCs contribute to multiple aspects of school improvement.

Key responsibilities include:

In many contexts, SMCs serve as early intervention platforms. Attendance irregularities, infrastructure issues, and/or safety concerns can be identified and addressed promptly when community members are involved.

The Importance of Community Participation in Schools

Community participation strengthens accountability. When parents are aware of school plans and performance, transparency improves. Dialogue between teachers and families becomes more regular and constructive.

Local knowledge also plays an important role in addressing challenges. Seasonal migration, agricultural cycles, or socioeconomic constraints often influence attendance patterns. Community members are better positioned to understand and respond to such factors.

Active SMCs foster shared ownership. Instead of perceiving education as a service delivered solely by the state, communities begin to see schools as collective responsibilities.

Evidence from the Field: Strengthening Community Ownership

LinkedIn

The role of community participation in sustaining school transformation was underscored during a district-level conference held in Alwar, Rajasthan. The conference focused on effective community engagement in school development and brought together School Management Committee (SMC) and School Development Management Committee (SDMC) members, gram panchayat representatives, school principals, and officials from the Department of Education.

The event saw participation from 147 stakeholders, including 37 school principals, 21 teachers from Transform Lives one school at a time program schools, and 89 members of SMCs, SDMCs, and gram panchayats.

Senior district education officials emphasised that school transformation cannot be sustained without community ownership. Participants shared practical examples of improving school environments, strengthening monitoring systems, and supporting holistic child development.

The discussions reflected a growing recognition that sustained progress in government schools depends on structured community involvement rather than isolated interventions.

Impact of Effective School Prabandhan

Where school prabandhan is implemented meaningfully and SMCs function actively, improvements are often visible.

Observed impacts include:

While structural challenges remain in many regions, participatory governance models have demonstrated the potential to create steady, long-term improvements.

Advancing School Prabandhan: Strengthening the Next Phase

Strengthening School Management Committees requires continuous capacity-building and institutional support. Initial awareness is often insufficient; ongoing orientation and skill development are essential.

Recent efforts to advance school prabandhan have focused on:

Such measures deepen the effectiveness of SMCs and move participation beyond attendance toward informed engagement.

The objective is to strengthen governance capacity at the grassroots level, ensuring that schools remain accountable, inclusive, and responsive to student needs.

Strengthening Schools Through Collective Effort

School Management Committees represent one of the most significant participatory mechanisms within India’s education system. By formally integrating parents and community members into school governance, SMCs reinforce the idea that quality education is a shared responsibility.

Effective school prabandhan does not rely solely on policy directives. It depends on active engagement, transparency, and sustained collaboration between educators, parents, and local institutions.

When communities participate meaningfully in managing schools, improvements become more durable. Enrollment stabilizes, attendance strengthens, and school environments become more supportive. Sustainable school development rests not only on resources, but on collective commitment.

About the Reviewer

Ms. Pooja O. Murada
Principal lead, Outreach for Development, S M Sehgal Foundation

Mass communications master’s; English honors; bridge marketing program (Tuck School of Business); over twenty years in brand management, marketing, and development communications in the corporate and development sector. Spearheaded a community radio in an aspirational district; former chairperson of the gender committee at Sehgal Foundation, invited ICC member, Volvo India, and former governing board member of Community Radio Association.

The post School Management Committees: Why They Matter and How They Work appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

Every year, International Women’s Day gives us a reason to stop and look around. Milestones matter, but so does the steady work that continues behind the scenes.

At S M Sehgal Foundation, we’ve learned something over many years of working across villages: real change doesn’t come from the outside. True change grows from within communities. And more often than not, women are the ones who are holding that growth together as farmers, mothers, frontline workers, mobilizers, and so much more.

From Rajasthan to Bihar, Haryana to Uttarakhand, these women aren’t waiting to be called leaders. They already are leaders.

This Women’s Day, we share a few of their stories, not as statistics, but as lived experiences from the field.

Women Lead in Water Management

In rural India, the work of fetching water has always landed on women and girls. Hours every day. Long distances. Heavy vessels. Not a metaphor, fetching water is a daily reality that shapes what else a woman can or can’t do with her time.

In Durga Nagar Township, Dewas district, Madhya Pradesh, a 25,000-liter community water tank was built as part of an Integrated Village Development Project. Our Water Management Program team worked with the community to provide households with round-the-clock access to stored water.

For Anita and others like her in the settlement, this access also means something as simple as time—for family, for rest, and for themselves. The tank infrastructure, now looked after by a community committee is also a model of shared ownership.

Women aren’t only the beneficiaries—they are often the ones driving the community conversations.

Read Full Story:

Kunti Gupta, project coordinator, S M Sehgal Foundation

Kunti Gupta, a project coordinator with S M Sehgal Foundation, was recognized as a Women Water Champion by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) for her work in water conservation, quality, and wastewater management across Haryana and Bihar. She started as a community mobilizer. Over years of working directly with villages dealing with scarcity, salinity, and fluoride contamination, she became someone people naturally turn to for help. Her work in community sessions, awareness drives, and slow, patient capacity building is not glamorous. But the impact is real.

When women are part of water governance, the solutions tend to last.

Read Full Story:

Women in Agriculture: Doing the Work and Finally Getting the Recognition

While women have long contributed to farming in India, their access to resources, markets, and formal recognition has often remained limited. In Champawat district, Uttarakhand, the Champawat Monal Farmer Producer Company, formed under our Agriculture Development program, is working to change that by supporting small and marginal farmers with high-yielding seeds, skill training, and connections to markets.

Today, the company has 1,124 shareholders, including 1,119 women and 5 men. In the past year alone, 450 new women shareholders have joined. Women are also part of the leadership, with five women serving on the Board of Directors and five women as promoters.

Godavari Kaloni used to describe herself mainly as a homemaker. Now she travels to neighboring villages, guiding other farmers through crop planning, pest management, and fertilizer use. That’s a real shift in role, in confidence, in how she sees herself.

Geeta Devi says she used to be afraid to speak in public. But not anymore! Farmer Interest Group meetings gave her a space to talk, ask questions, and push back when something didn’t seem right.

Pushpa Chaubey has taken on something even harder by going village to village, encouraging women farmers to step forward and speak in the first place. That kind of mobilization is slow, unglamorous work. But it’s also the work that makes everything else possible.

The fields of Champawat are changing the crops they grow, the methods they use, and the people who have a say in how agriculture is handled and how decisions are made.

Read Full Story:

Education Takes a Whole Community

In Alwar, Rajasthan, eighteen-year-old Afseena was studying from a single worn-out textbook. That was before Project Umeed brought a solar-powered digital library to her school with computers, a smart board, and access to resources she hadn’t had before.

Afseena is one of nearly 4,000 children across multiple states who now have that access—but the technology is only part of the change.

School Management Committees that include mothers and community members are taking on the responsibility for these spaces—showing up to monitor what’s working and pushing for better attendance. When mothers become genuinely invested in schools, schools become better institutions. That’s not mere theory, we’ve seen it happen in real time.

Afseena’s story, more than about digital literacy, demonstrates what happens when a community decides that their children deserve more.

Read Full Story:

Community Is Where Leadership Actually Starts

In Kultajpur, Haryana, Pinki Devi signed up for Pashu Sakhi training under an agriculture initiative. Some villagers were initially hesitant to accept livestock health advice from a woman. Time was needed for trust to build through consistent effort, practical demonstrations, and results that spoke for themselves.

Within a year, she had treated and dewormed more than a hundred animals. As a result, goat prices in the village went up because the animals were healthier. She now earns an independent income. People call on her because she knows what she’s talking about.

In Bihar’s East Champaran district, a different kind of work is happening. Nutrition workshops for frontline workers, including anganwadi workers, auxiliary nurse midwives, and community health staff, are building awareness around maternal and child nutrition. These aren’t headline-making interventions, but they shift how communities think about food, health, and preventive care–which matters.

Taken together, these aren’t isolated stories. They’re part of a pattern: when women are given knowledge and a real place in decision-making, entire communities grow stronger.

Read Full Story:

To the Women of S M Sehgal Foundation

None of this happens without the people doing the day-to-day work.

Women field coordinators travel village to village. Program leads figure out what actually works. Researchers ask the harder questions. Community mobilizers hold meetings under trees or in panchayat halls. Their work doesn’t always make end up in reports. But their work is what holds everything together across more than 1,000 villages in multiple states.

We see it. We’re grateful for it.

Meet Our Team

Her Story Is Our Story

The stories described here are just a small slice of what’s happening across rural India.

In water committees, farmer cooperatives, classrooms, livestock groups, and health workshops, women are shaping their communities in ways both visible and quiet. Their strength may not be loud or dramatic. But their influence is practical, persistent, and consistent.

Something real continues to build by the day.

If these stories stayed with you, many more are waiting in the Stories section of S M Sehgal Foundation’ Read More

Happy Women’s Day

To every woman who keeps showing up for her village, her family, her community—we see you. We celebrate you. And we’re with you.

Priya Chaudhary
Social Impact, CSR, and Gender & Development

Priya Chaudhary is an expert in Social Impact, CSR, and Gender & Development with a focus on gender equity, social inclusion, and evidence-based change. With extensive experience in project management, storytelling, and qualitative research, she has worked on various NGO marketing and development projects.

The post Her Strength Is India’s Future: Women Who are Changing Rural Communities appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

} .content.active { display: block; } } } } /* Responsive */ @media (max-width: 991px) { .section_header{ .header_section_image{ width: 43%; } } .header_bottom_section{ & ul{ grid-template-columns: repeat(3, 1fr); } } } @media(width <= 768px){ .section_header{ flex-direction: column; .header_section_text{ width: 100%; } .header_section_image{ width: 100%; text-align: center; img{ width: 90%; margin: 0 auto; } } } .header_bottom_section{ & ul{ grid-template-columns: repeat(2, 1fr); } } .tab_section{ .tab_container{ flex-direction: column; .tab_buttons{ width: 100%; flex-direction: row; gap: 1rem; overflow-x: scroll; .tab_btn{ flex: none; font-size: 1.5rem; i{ font-size: 2rem; } } } .tab_buttons::-webkit-scrollbar{ height: 8px; } .tab_buttons::-webkit-scrollbar-track{ background-color: #f26651; border-radius: 10px; } .tab_buttons::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb{ background-color: #3cba84; border-radius: 10px; } .tab_buttons::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb:hover{ background-color: #f36652; } .tab_content{ width: 100%; } } } .modern_cta_button{ flex-direction: column; .modern_cta_text{ width: 100%; } .modern_cta_image{ width: 100%; text-align: center; padding-bottom: 2rem; img{ width: 90%; } } } } @media(width <= 600px){ .important_section{ & ul{ grid-template-columns: repeat(1, 1fr); gap: 1rem; } } } @media(width <= 576px){ .header_bottom_section{ ul{ grid-template-columns: repeat(1, 1fr); } } .section_header { & .header_section_image { img { width: 100%; margin: 0 auto; } } } }

The use of water in food production is becoming an increasingly critical issue due to the impacts of climate change and a rising global population. As water scarcity intensifies, the agricultural sector, which consumes the majority of our planet’s finite water resources, must adopt more efficient irrigation methods. Agriculture accounts for 70% of the global freshwater usage and up to 95% of water withdrawals in some developing nations.

How does a drip irrigation system work?

Unlike surface and sprinkler irrigation, drip irrigation wets only a portion of the soil root zone, potentially as little as 30% of the volume wetted by other methods. The wetting patterns that result from dripping water onto the soil vary based on discharge rates and soil types, such as sand and clay.

Despite only wetting part of the root zone, this is essential to meet the crop’s full water needs. Drip irrigation does not reduce the water consumed by crops; rather, it ensures precise water application to support optimal growth.

The primary water savings in a drip irrigation system come from minimizing deep percolation, surface runoff, and soil evaporation.

How can Modern Technologies Help Indian Farmers Improve Agriculture?

Explore Modern Agriculture Technology

Why should farmers consider the drip irrigation system?

The short answer is water conservation. However, if you are looking to understand the ‘why’ behind the farmer’s preference for drip irrigation, take a look at these 7 ways in which drip irrigation conserves water:

How S M Sehgal Foundation supports drip irrigation adoption

S M Sehgal Foundation’s Agriculture Development Program enhances mechanization adoption among small and marginal farmers by offering farm machinery at subsidized rates. Farmers invest in the machinery, fostering ownership and entrepreneurial spirit. Training is provided for operation and maintenance, enabling farmers to generate additional income by leasing equipment to fellow farmers.

Jameel adopts drip irrigation and tomato staking methods

Jameel, a farmer from Tauru block in Nuh district, Haryana, attended an S M Sehgal Foundation meeting in August 2021 and learned about drip irrigation benefits to address critically low water levels. He adopted the technique in December 2021, leading to a 40% increase in his tomato yield. Inspired by the success, he invested INR 1,00,000 in February 2022 to expand drip irrigation and staking for bottle gourd cultivation.

His success highlights the importance of drip irrigation for improving yields and farmer incomes.

Read Jameel’s full story here.

About the Reviewer

Ms. Pooja O. Murada
Principal lead, Outreach for Development, S M Sehgal Foundation

Mass communications master’s; English honors; bridge marketing program (Tuck School of Business); over twenty years in brand management, marketing, and development communications in the corporate and development sector. Spearheaded a community radio in an aspirational district; former chairperson of the gender committee at Sehgal Foundation, invited ICC member, Volvo India, and former governing board member of Community Radio Association.

The post What is a drip <span>irrigation system</span> and how does it help to save water? appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.

When conversations turn to food security, women are often spoken about as beneficiaries. Rarely are they acknowledged as producers, planners, and decision-makers who hold food systems together.

Across rural landscapes, women sow seeds, preserve grain, manage livestock, and ensure that households eat—even in years when crops fail. Their contribution to food security and sustainability is not marginal. It is structural. Without women in agriculture, global food systems would simply not function.

Despite this, women continue to farm without recognition, land titles, or equal access to resources. As climate pressures intensify and food systems grow more fragile, acknowledging and strengthening women’s role in agriculture is no longer optional. Their role is essential to sustaining food security and sustainable agriculture.

This is a story about that invisible backbone and what happens when women are finally given space, support, and voice.

Why Food Security Cannot Be Separated from Gender

Food security goes beyond producing enough food. It is about access, nutrition, stability, and resilience over time. Sustainable food systems ensure that today’s needs are met without undermining tomorrow’s capacity to produce.

Globally, women make up a significant share of agricultural workers, especially in smallholder farming systems. In India, women are involved in nearly every stage of food production—from sowing and weeding to harvesting, storage, and processing. Yet the gender gap in agriculture remains stark.

Women farmers often lack:

This gap directly affects food security. Studies repeatedly show that when women farmers have equal access to resources, farm productivity improves, and household nutrition outcomes strengthen. Gender equality, food security, and sustainability are deeply linked.

Women’s Contributions to Food Security on the Ground

In rural India, women’s role in agriculture extends far beyond labor.

Women working in agriculture are often responsible for maintaining kitchen gardens, preserving seeds, managing household nutrition, and ensuring dietary diversity. Their knowledge of traditional crops and local ecosystems supports biodiversity conservation in ways formal systems often overlook.

Women in farming also play a critical role in adapting to climate stress. Through crop diversification, seed saving, and careful water use, women contribute to agriculture and did so long before the term entered policy vocabulary.

In households, women are the first to adjust food consumption during shortages to ensure that children and elders eat adequately. This “invisible” labor is central to nutrition security, even as it remains largely unrecognized.

When Empowerment Takes Root at the Grassroots

If women’s contributions are so central, why are they so often unsupported?

Part of the answer lies in how agricultural systems are designed around land ownership, market access, and credit structures, which have traditionally excluded women. Change begins when these systems are reimagined at the local level.

In Champawat district of Uttarakhand, such a reimagining is slowly unfolding.

Nestled between forests and hills, Champawat is rich in biodiversity but constrained by limited irrigation and wildlife pressures. With nearly 65 percent forest cover and only a small share of irrigated land, farming here has always been demanding. Crop depredation by wild animals, lack of modern inputs, and limited market access have made agriculture an uncertain livelihood.

What stands out in Champawat, however, is the way gender roles have evolved. Women work the fields, manage households, and increasingly step into leadership roles, and men participate in domestic responsibilities more openly than in many other regions.

This balance became the foundation for a different kind of agriculture intervention.

From Kitchen Gardens to Leadership Schools

Under a CSR-supported initiative implemented by S M Sehgal Foundation, agriculture in Champawat began to be viewed not just as production, but as an ecosystem.

Kitchen gardens were promoted to improve household nutrition and reduce dependency on markets. Women grew vegetables close to home, strengthening food security while supplementing income.

At the same time, leadership training programs for women were introduced—spaces where women not only learned farming techniques, but also how to speak in public forums, manage groups, and participate in decision-making.

Livestock management training added another layer, equipping women with skills in animal husbandry, dairy practices, and sustainable care, activities traditionally handled by women but rarely formalized or rewarded.

Together these initiatives created something rare: a system that recognized women not just as workers, but as farmers and leaders.

The Champawat Monal FPC: Women at the Center

A turning point came with the formation of the Champawat Monal Farmer Producer Company.

Built on regular community meetings and Farmer Interest Groups across fifty villages, the FPC was designed to support small and marginal farmers through better inputs, skills, and market access. The crucial component: women were not add-ons. They were central.

Today the company has more than 500 female shareholders.

The establishment of a modern nursery under the FPC provided access to high-quality seeds, fertilizers, and planting material, reducing risk and improving yields. Women farmers were trained in selecting crop varieties that could withstand climatic stress and pest pressures, ensuring uniform growth and better market prices.

For many women, this marked a shift not just in farming practice, but in personal identity.

Finding Voice Alongside Livelihood

Godavari Kaloni, a shareholder from Khedikot village, describes this change simply. Earlier, she saw herself only as a homemaker. Now she travels across villages, advising farmers on crop varieties, pest management, and fertilizer use.

Geeta Devi, who had earlier worked on a tea farm, speaks of overcoming her fear of public speaking through regular group meetings. These meetings, she says, gave her confidence to advocate sustainable agriculture practices among fellow farmers.

Pushpa Chaubey, working across four villages, now mobilizes women farmers to participate actively in discussions and decision-making. For her, economic independence and social confidence have become intertwined goals.

These women are not exceptions. They are indicators of what happens when empowerment is structured, sustained, and rooted in local realities.

The Barriers That Still Remain

Despite these advances, barriers persist.

Gender inequality in agriculture continues due to unequal land rights, limited access to credit, and their exclusion from formal extension services. Climate change further intensifies women’s vulnerability, as they are often the first to absorb the shocks from crop failure or water scarcity.

Without addressing these systemic issues, progress remains fragile.

Women-Led Innovation and Collective Solutions

What Champawat demonstrates is that women-led solutions are not limited to subsistence.

Through cooperatives, regenerative agriculture practices, and organic farming initiatives, women farmers are redefining what sustainable farming looks like. Women farmer cooperatives strengthen bargaining power, reduce costs, and enable collective learning.

Food waste reduction, seed preservation, and diversified cropping systems are often driven by women’s groups—quietly reshaping food systems from the ground up.

Scaling these models requires institutional backing, not reinvention.

The Path Forward

If food security and sustainability are the goals, empowering women in agriculture must be the strategy.

This means:

The Sustainable Development Goals, particularly Zero Hunger and Gender Equality, are not separate ambitions. They are mutually dependent.

The story unfolding in Champawat shows what is possible when women are recognized not as support systems, but as central actors in agriculture. The sacks they carry uphill are not just “produce.” They are proof of resilience, agency, and a future where food security is built on equality.

Priya Chaudhary
Social Impact, CSR, and Gender & Development

Priya Chaudhary is an expert in Social Impact, CSR, and Gender & Development with a focus on gender equity, social inclusion, and evidence-based change. With extensive experience in project management, storytelling, and qualitative research, she has worked on various NGO marketing and development projects.

The post Spotlight on the Role of Women Farmers in Food Security and Sustainability appeared first on S M Sehgal Foundation.